Sustainable Substitutes for Apple Podcasts

The built-in podcast client by Apple that harvests user data and censors content.

apple-podcasts logo

Reasons to avoid Apple Podcasts

Apple Podcasts presents itself as a neutral and open directory, yet in reality it embeds a content app within a monopolistic ecosystem that harvests listening data, censors shows and episodes at the behest of authoritarian governments without disclosure and is operated by a corporation repeatedly sanctioned for tax avoidance.

Listeners who value open distribution, transparent platforms and genuine content neutrality should therefore avoid it and choose a more ethical substitute.

Ethical and Sustainable Apple Podcasts Alternatives

Copied!
  • Feasibility: How easily can the average user switch to this substitute? Higher feasibility results in a higher ranking.
  • Editor's Rating: How sustainable is the substitute? The more sustainability attributes it fulfils, the higher it is ranked.

The 7 main issues with Apple Podcasts

Big Tech - Big Tech companies do not nourish people and planet. This is especially true in times of political tension.

Apple Podcasts is a core service of Apple, one of the largest and most valuable corporations in the world. It is preinstalled on every iPhone, which extends Apple's gatekeeper position over software distribution into the podcast medium and channels listening activity into its own ecosystem. Source: TechCrunch: Apple sued by DOJ over iPhone monopoly claims (2024)

Privacy Concerns - User data is likely to be stored and used against users' best interest.

Apple's own privacy disclosure confirms that Apple Podcasts collects data about listening behaviour and interactions, links subscriptions to the Apple Account and records a device trust score, so a nominally free app operates as a data-collection point within Apple's wider apparatus. Source: Apple Legal: Apple Podcasts & Privacy

Data Monopolies - Control of vast amounts of user data, creating risks for privacy and potential misuse.

Apple aggregates listening data across hundreds of millions of devices and unilaterally controls which analytics creators receive, giving it informational leverage over the independent podcast industry that no single publisher can match. Source: Apple Legal: Apple Podcasts & Privacy

Monopoly - Market dominance that stifles competition and limits user choice.

The United States Department of Justice sued Apple in 2024 for maintaining an alleged smartphone monopoly that suppresses rival apps and cross-platform functionality. Apple Podcasts benefits from default placement and pays no commission, whereas competing podcast apps must surrender up to thirty per cent of in-app subscription revenue. Source: TechCrunch: Apple sued by DOJ over iPhone monopoly claims (2024)

Lack of Transparency - Opacity in operations, data handling, or supply chains, making it difficult for users to understand practices.

Apple moved feed parsing from users' devices to its own servers without announcement, which enables the silent removal of individual episodes in specific countries without any indication to listeners that content is missing. Source: Podnews: How Apple Podcasts works in China: and why you're (probably) not there (2025)

Support of Authoritarian Regimes - Companies actively supporting, financing and legitimising regimes and unethical policies.

Apple enforces the censorship demands of the Chinese authorities. The rival app Pocket Casts was removed from the Chinese App Store at the request of the Cyberspace Administration of China, while Apple Podcasts remains available there with only a specially selected list of shows and with individual episodes deleted on request. Source: Podnews: How Apple Podcasts works in China: and why you're (probably) not there (2025)heise online: Apple's App Store transparency report: Which apps have been censored and where (2026)

Tax Avoidance - Aggressive strategies are being deployed to avoid paying taxes.

In September 2024 the Court of Justice of the European Union definitively confirmed that Ireland granted Apple unlawful tax advantages through favourable rulings, and Apple must repay approximately thirteen billion euros. Source: Court of Justice of the European Union: Tax rulings press release (2024)

Suggestions and Feedback

If you have suggestions for more alternatives or general feedback, please contact me via email or create an issue over on Codeberg. Suggest Substitute on Codeberg Write an Email